World News Evaluating progress towards sustainable advancement over space and time

World News

Abstract

To attend to worldwide difficulties^{1, 2, 3, 4}, 193 nations have actually committed to the 17 United Nations Sustainable Advancement Goals (SDGs)⁵ Measuring progress towards attaining the SDGs is important to track international efforts towards sustainable advancement and guide policy advancement and implementation. However, methodical techniques for examining spatio-temporal progress towards attaining the SDGs are lacking. Here we develop and check organized approaches to measure development towards the 17 SDGs at nationwide and subnational levels in China. Our analyses indicate that China’s SDG Index score (an aggregate rating representing the general efficiency towards attaining all 17 SDGs) increased at the national level from 2000 to2015 Every province likewise increased its SDG Index score over this duration. There were large spatio-temporal variations throughout areas. For instance, eastern China had a greater SDG Index score than western China in the 2000 s, and southern China had a greater SDG Index rating than northern China in2015 At the nationwide level, the scores of 13 of the 17 SDGs enhanced over time, however ball games of four SDGs declined. This research study recommends the need to track the spatio-temporal characteristics of development towards SDGs at the worldwide level and in other nations.

Information accessibility

All information are readily available from the matching authors upon affordable request. Information that support the findings of this research study are readily available within the paper and its Supplementary Information

References

1.
Liu, J. et al. Systems combination for worldwide sustainability. Science347, 1258832 (2015).
2.
Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Four billion people facing extreme water deficiency. Sci. Adv 2, e1500323(2016).
3.
International Energy Company. World Energy Outlook 2015(IEA, 2015).
4.
Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C. R. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature504, 211–213(2013).
5.
United Nations. Sustainable Advancement Objectives: 17 Objectives to Transform Our World http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/(UN, 2015).
6.
Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Teksoz, K., Durand-Delacre, D. & Sachs, J. D. National standards for the Sustainable Advancement Objectives examined in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nat. Geosci 10, 547–555(2017).
7.
Rodrik, D. The past, present, and future of economic development. Challenge57, 5–39(2014).
8.
Xie, Y. & Zhou, X. Income inequality in today’s China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 6928–6933(2014).
9.
Liu, J. G. et al. China’s environment on a metacoupled world. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res 43, 1–34(2018).
10
Liu, J. & Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature435, 1179–1186(2005).
11
Ouyang, Z. et al. Improvements in environment services from financial investments in natural capital. Science352, 1455–1459(2016).
12
Bryan, B. A. et al. China’s action to a nationwide land-system sustainability emergency situation. Nature559, 193–204(2018).
13
Ortuño-Padilla, A., Espinosa-Flor, A. & Cerdán-Aznar, L. Development strategies at station areas in Southwestern China: the case of Mianyang city. Land Usage Policy68, 660–670(2017).
14
Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G. & Fuller, G. SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2018 https://www.sdgindex.org/reports/sdg-index-and-dashboards-2018(Pica, 2018).
15
Lu, Z. & Deng, X. Regional policy and local advancement: a case research study of China’s Western Advancement Strategy. Ann. Univ. Apulensis Ser. Oeconomica15, 250–264(2013).
< meta content=" Gai, K. Study on The Coordination in between Ecological Environment and Economic Development in West China. [in C" itemprop="headline">16.
Gai, K. Study on The Coordination between Ecological Environment and Economic Development in West China. [in Chinese] https://www.sdgindex.org/reports/sdg-index-and-dashboards-2018, PhD thesis, Southwestern University of Financing and Economics (2008).
< meta material=" Yuan, N. Study on the Sustainable Advancement of West China Economy.[in Chinese] https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/de" itemprop=" heading" >17
Yuan, N. Research Study on the Sustainable Advancement of West China Economy.[in Chinese] https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD2008 & filename =-LRB- ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************). nh & uid= WEEvREcwSlJHSldRa1FhdXNXaEhoOHRuWm1vU2REWU45 b2ozL013 SWRJTT0=$, Master’s thesis, Sichuan University (2006).
18
Jayachandran, S. The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Ann. Rev. Econ 7, 63 (2015).
19
Chen, Z. Introduce of the health-care reform plan in China. Lancet373, 1322–1324(2009).
20
Mok, K. H. & Wu, A. M. College, changing labour market and social mobility in the era of massification in China. J. Educ. Work29, 77–97(2016).
21
Wilkinson, R. G. & Pickett, K. E. Earnings inequality and social dysfunction. Annu. Rev. Sociol 35, 493–511(2009).
22
Liu, J. An incorporated framework for accomplishing Sustainable Advancement Objectives around the globe. Ecol. Econ. Soc 1, 11–17(2018).
23
Nerini, F. F. et al. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 3, 10–15(2018).
24
State Council of China. China Carries Out the 2030 Program for Sustainable Advancement Nation Programme[in Chinese] https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zyxw/t1405173 shtml(SSC, 2016).
25
United Nations Statistics Division. SDG Indicators https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list(UNSD, 2017).
26
Schmidt-Traub, G., De la Mothe Karoubi, E. & Espey, J. Indicators and a Tracking Structure for the Sustainable Advancement Goals: Launching a Data Revolution for the SDGs https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/publication/indicators-monitoring-framework-sustainable-development-goals-launching-data-revolution_en(Sustainable Advancement Solutions Network, 2015).
27
Golding, N. et al. Mapping under-5 and neonatal mortality in Africa, 2000-15: a standard analysis for the Sustainable Advancement Goals. Lancet390, 2171–2182(2017).
28
Alia, D. Y. Development towards the sustainable development goal on hardship: examining the impact of income development on the exit time from hardship in Benin. Sustain. Dev 25, 495–503(2017).
< meta material=" National Bureau of Statistics of the Individuals's Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook[in Chinese] http:" itemprop=" headline" >29
National Bureau of Statistics of the Individuals’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook[in Chinese] http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/( China Data Press,2001–2016).
< meta content=" Ministry of Finance of individuals's Republic of China. Financing Yearbook of China[in Chinese] http://tongji.cn" itemprop=" headline" >30
Ministry of Finance of individuals’s Republic of China. Financing Yearbook of China[in Chinese] http://tongji.cnki.net/kns55/ navi/HomePage. aspx?id= N2014020005 & name= YZGCZ( China Financial & Economic Publishing House,2001–2016).
31
National Bureau of Statistics & State Environmental Management Administration of the Individuals’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook on Environment[in Chinese] http://www.shujuku.org/china-environmental-statistics-yearbook.html( China Data Press,2001-2016).
< meta content=" Ministry of Education of individuals's Republic of China. Educational Data Yearbook of China[in Chinese]" itemprop=" heading" >32
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Educational Statistics Yearbook of China[in Chinese] http://tongji.cnki.net/kns55/ Navi/HomePage. aspx?id= N2012010030 & name= YZKRM & flooring= 1( Individuals’s Education Press,2001-2016).
< meta material= "Ministry of Health of individuals's Republic of China. China Health Statistical Yearbook[in Chinese] http://ww" itemprop= "headline" >33
Ministry of Health of individuals’s Republic of China. China Health Statistical Yearbook[in Chinese]http://www.shujuku.org/china-health-statistical-yearbook.html( Peking Union Medical College Press,2001-2016).
34
National Bureau of Data of the People’s Republic of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook[in Chinese] http://tongji.cnki.net/kns55/ Navi/HomePage. aspx?id= N2016120537 & name= YCXME & floor= 1(China Data Press, 2001–2016).
35
National Bureau of Data of the Individuals’s Republic of China. China Population Statistics Yearbook[in Chinese] http://tongji.cnki.net/kns55/ navi/HomePage. aspx?id= N2007091124 & name= YZGRL & flooring= 1(China Data Press, 2001-2006).
36
Costa, L., Rybski, D. & Kropp, J. P. A human advancement structure for CO₂ reductions. Plos One 6, e29262(2011).
37
Turner, M. G., Wu, Y., Wallace, L. L., Romme, W. H. & Brenkert, A. Simulating winter interactions amongst ungulates, plants, and fire in northern Yellowstone Park. Ecol. Appl 4, 472–496(1994).
38
Liu, J. & Ashton, P. S. FORMOSAIC: an individual-based spatially specific design for replicating forest dynamics in landscape mosaics. Ecol. Modell 106, 177–200(1998).
39
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Resource and Environment Data Cloud Platform[in Chinese] http://www.resdc.cn/data.aspx?DATAID=202(2015).
40
Frigge, M., Hoaglin, D. C. & Iglewicz, B. Some implementations of the boxplot. Am. Stat 43, 50–54(1989).
41
Krzywinski, M. & Altman, N. Visualizing samples with box plots. Nat. Methods11, 119–120(2014).

Download recommendations

Recognitions

We acknowledge edits from S. Nichols and K. Kapsar, and information compilation from Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Zhou and Y. Sun. We are grateful for monetary assistance from the National Science Foundation, Michigan State University, Michigan AgBioResearch, the China Scholarship Council and the National Life Sciences Foundation of China (grant numbers 51621061 and 51321001).

Author info

Affiliations

Center for Systems Combination and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
- Zhenci Xu
- , Sophia N. Chau
- , Yingjie Li
- , Thomas Dietz
- , Shuxin Li
- , Anna Herzberger
- , Ying Tang
- & Jianguo Liu
College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
- Xiuzhi Chen
- , Jinyan Wang
- & Yunkai Li
School of Life Sciences, State Secret Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Jian Zhang
Environmental Science and Policy Program, Department of Sociology and Animal Researches Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
- Thomas Dietz
Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
- Julie A. Winkler
- & Ying Tang
School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
- Fan Fan
Institutes of Science and Advancement, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Baorong Huang
Institute of Land and Urban-Rural Advancement, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China
- Shaohua Wu
Department of Humanities and Info, Zhejiang College of Construction, Hangzhou, China
- Dequ Hong

Authors

Look For Zhenci Xu in:
Look For Sophia N. Chau in:
Look For Xiuzhi Chen in:
Look For Jian Zhang in:
Search for Yingjie Li in:
Browse for Thomas Dietz in:
Look For Jinyan Wang in:
Look For Julie A. Winkler in:
Search for Fan in:
Search for Baorong Huang in:
Search for Shuxin Li in:
Search for Shaohua Wu in:
Search for Anna Herzberger in:
Look For Ying Tang in:
Browse for Dequ Hong in:
Look For Yunkai Li in:
Look For Jianguo Liu in:

Contributions

Z.X. and J.L. developed the research. Yunkai Li and X.C. contributed and examined information. Z.X., S.N.C., J.L., T.D., Yunkai Li, Y.T., X.C., S.L., B.H., A.H., J.A.W. and D.H. supplied remarks on the manuscript. Z.X., J.Z., Yingjie Li and F.F. analysed the data. Yunkai Li and X.C. assisted to analyse data connected to SDGs 2 and 6. Z.X., S.N.C., J.Z., Yingjie Li and J.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors evaluated the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to.
Yunkai Li or Jianguo Liu

Principles statements

Competing interests

The authors declare no contending interests.

Extra info

Peer evaluation info Nature thanks Brett Bryan, Xiangzheng Deng, Lei Gao and Jürgen Kropp for their contribution to the peer evaluation of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in released maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 2 Unpredictability analysis for SDG ratings ( n = 281,287) at the nationwide level in 2015 for various varieties of chosen indicators.

1–17 indicates unpredictability analysis for SDG 1–17 Test sizes are 63, 1,023, 262,143, 1,023, 63, 63, 7, 15, 16,383, 15, 63, 127, 31, 7, 127, 7 and 127 for box plots of SDG 1–17 In each box plot, the central rectangle spans the very first quartile Q1 to the third quartile Q3, which is the interquartile variety (IQR)^40,41(IQR = Q3 to Q1), while the line section inside the rectangular shape reveals the typical. When the maximum observed SDG ratings are higher than Q3 1.5 × IQR^40,41, the upper whisker (red) is Q3 1.5 × IQR^40,41 Otherwise, the upper hair is the optimum observed SDG rating. When the minimum observed SDG ratings are less than Q1 − 1.5 × IQR^40,41, the lower whisker (green) is Q1 − 1.5 × IQR. Otherwise, the lower whisker is the minimum observed SDG score^40,41

Extended Data Fig. 3 Level of sensitivity of SDG ratings to modifications in each sign.

The level of sensitivity index S_x of SDG ratings is revealed when each SDG indication’s original data value decreased by 10%, (1 )–(16), or increased by 10%, (17)–(32), for China and for 3 example provinces (Beijing, Henan and Gansu) at 3 levels (high, middle and low) of the typical SDG scores in 2000, 2005, 2010 and2015 The sample size n for each figure is 119 signs. The x axes display the SDG indicators set up from 1 to119 The y axis is the level of sensitivity index S_x of SDG ratings due to the 10?cline or boost in the initial value of each indication.

Extended Data Fig. 4 China’s SDG Index rating compared to another 156 nations based upon overlapping indications.

The box plot illustrates the distribution of SDG Index scores ( n = 156) for 156 countries in one year. The central rectangular shape covers the first quartile Q1 to the third quartile Q3, which is the IQR^40,41, while the line sector inside the rectangular shape shows the mean. When the optimum observed SDG Index ratings are greater than Q3 1.5 × IQR, the upper whisker amounts to Q3 1.5 × IQR^40,41 Otherwise, the upper whisker is equivalent to the maximum observed SDG Index score. When the minimum observed SDG Index score is less than Q1 − 1.5 × IQR, the lower whisker is equivalent to Q1 − 1.5 × IQR^40,41 Otherwise, the lower hair is the minimum observed SDG Index score^40,41 The green line segment within package is the typical value of SDG Index scores for the 156 nations.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Coefficient of variation for SDG scores.

a, Coefficient of variation (CV) for SDG scores of provinces in 2000, 2005, 2010 and2015 b, Typical value of the coefficient of variation for SDG ratings at the provincial level in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015.

Additional information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-7, Supplementary Conversation, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References

About this post

Mention this post

Xu, Z., Chau, S.N., Chen, X. et al. Evaluating progress towards sustainable development over area and time.
Nature577, 74–78(2020) doi: 10.1038/ s41586-019-1846 -3

Download citation

Received
05 February 2018
Accepted
06 November 2019
Published
01 January 2020
Issue Date
02 January 2020
DOI
https://doi.org/101038/ s41586-019-1846 -3

Comments

By submitting a remark you concur to follow our Terms and Neighborhood Guidelines If you find something violent or that does not abide by our terms or standards please flag it as unsuitable.