Throughout Wednesday’s public questioning of Home Democrats’ witnesses, diplomats Expense Taylor and George Kent, Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe asked if either bureaucrat existed “to assert that there was an impeachable offense” in the president’s questionable July call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky His question was fulfilled by definite silence.
” You understand, if that was their opening stage, that was very little,” Bennett commented.
Bennett said that the “genuine point” is that “this is a policy disagreement,” which “ended up being clear as the hearing went on.”
” Therefore,” he added, “it fits precisely what [Alexander] Hamilton cautioned about in the Federalist Papers. Do not have it simply on a party basis.
” The other two recent impeachments were not. This one is. It’s not going anywhere. It’ll go permanently, but it won’t go anywhere,” he told the “Buddies” hosts.
“[The American people are] not buying the attacks and they’re not interested. Look, this is a public event now and there’s no break-in, there’s no break-in, [there are] no tapes, there’s no gown, there’s no sex, there’s no Monica Lewinsky … Interest simply isn’t there,” he concluded.