Connect with us

Info Web News

Tech Security ACLU says it’ll combat DHS efforts to utilize app areas for deportations


Technology

Tech Security ACLU says it’ll combat DHS efforts to utilize app areas for deportations

The American Civil Liberties Union plans to fight newly revealed practices by the Department of Homeland Security which used commercially available cell phone location data to track suspected illegal immigrants. “DHS should not be accessing our location information without a warrant, regardless whether they obtain it by paying or for free. The failure to get…

Tech Security ACLU says it’ll combat DHS efforts to utilize app areas for deportations

Tech Security

The American Civil Liberties Union prepares to fight newly revealed practices by the Department of Homeland Security which utilized commercially readily available mobile phone area information to track suspected prohibited immigrants.

” DHS needs to not be accessing our location info without a warrant, regardless whether they get it by paying or free of charge. The failure to get a warrant undermines Supreme Court precedent establishing that the government needs to demonstrate probable cause to a judge prior to getting some of our most delicate details, particularly our mobile phone area history,” said Nathan Freed Wessler, a staff lawyer with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Innovation Job.

Earlier today, The Wall Street Journal reported that Homeland Security, through its Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Custom-mades and Border Protection (CBP) firms, was buying geolocation data from commercial entities to examine suspects of alleged migration infractions.

The location information, which aggregators get from cellphone apps, consisting of video games, weather, shopping and search services, is being used by Homeland Security to spot undocumented immigrants and others entering the U.S. unlawfully, the Journal reported.

According to privacy specialists interviewed by the Journal, because the data is openly readily available for purchase, the government practices don’t appear to break the law– despite being what may be the largest dragnet ever performed by the U.S. government using the aggregated data of its residents.

It’s likewise an example of how the business security device put in location by private corporations in Democratic societies can be lawfully accessed by state firms to create the very same sort of surveillance networks used in more authoritarian nations like China, India and Russia.

Real Life. Real News. Real Voices

Help us tell more of the stories that matter

Become a founding member

” This is a traditional situation where sneaking industrial monitoring in the personal sector is now bleeding straight over into federal government,” Alan Butler, basic counsel of the Electronic Personal Privacy Info Center, a think tank that pushes for stronger privacy laws, informed the paper.

Behind the federal government’s usage of commercial information is a company called Venntel. Based in Herndon, Va., the business acts as a government professional and shares a number of its executive staff with Gravy Analytics, a mobile-advertising marketing analytics company. In all, ICE and the CBP have invested almost $1.3 million on licenses for software application that can offer location information for cellular phone. Homeland Security says that the data from these commercially available records is used to generate leads about border crossing and discovering human traffickers.

The ACLU’s Wessler has won these kinds of cases in the past. He effectively argued prior to the Supreme Court in the case of Carpenter v. United States that geographic location data from cellular phones was a protected class of details and could not be obtained by law enforcement without a warrant.

CBP explicitly omits cell tower data from the information it collects from Venntel, according to what a spokesperson for the firm informed the Journal– in part because it needs to under the law. The firm also said that it just accesses minimal area data, and that information is anonymized.

Nevertheless, anonymized information can be linked to specific people by associating that anonymous cellular phone info with the real-world movements of specific people, which can be either easily deduced or tracked through other kinds of public records and publicly offered social media.

ICE is currently being sued by the ACLU for another potential privacy offense. Late last year the ACLU said that it was taking the government to court over the DHS service’s use of so-called “stingray” innovation that spoofs a cellular phone tower to determine somebody’s location.

At the time, the ACLU mentioned a federal government oversight report in 2016 that suggested that both CBP and ICE jointly invested $13 million on purchasing dozens of stingrays, which the companies used to “find people for arrest and prosecution.”

Subscribe to the newsletter news

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

To Top